This is a follow up video to:    • Chapter 1-4: Rethinking General Relat...  

00:00 Warning: This is a follow-up video
00:32 Thank You and Extenuation
07:02 Now... About Jello
08:26 Much Ado About Tesseracts
12:49 Clarifying Concept 7 and Nuclear Bombs (sheesh)
18:35 Interpreting General Relativity Curvature
23:13 5D Minkowski Spacetime Clarifications
29:15 Modified Newtonian Dynamics and Inverse Square Law
39:40 Play with 5D in Video Games!
41:07 Conclusion and Upcoming

Thank you all for your overwhelming support on my inaugural YouTube leap into theoretical physics. While I am still working on the next chapter, I did a faster video (still took longer than I thought) to do some follow-up corrections, clarifications, and supporting evidence.

Your feedback means a lot to me, but if I keep addressing everything I will never get to the next chapter. I hope this offers enough in the way of clarifications address the majority of questions. As I didn't intend for my first video to "go viral" - I also felt I should take the time to clean up some of my mess.

Finally, I realized long after filming I say "so" waaay too much. So... I will work on that next time.

Wikipedia - Gravitational Potential (the trampoline)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravita...
Just put your time down, flip it and reverse it

Having trouble? This guy did a great job showing curvature as time dilation, but I honestly have no idea who he is:
https://gregoriobaquero.wordpress.com...
He isn't taking the "extra dimension" leap I am, but it's a similar thought process.

Overview of Modified Newtonian Dynamics
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/...
This is probably one of the best in-depth explanations of MOND you will find.

Wikipedia - Modified Newtonian Dynamics
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Modifie...
The ScienceDirect article is a little "thick" so if you just want to validate my point on the inverse-square law, this cuts right to the point:
"This is in large part due to MOND holding that exceedingly weak galactic-scale gravity holding galaxies together near their perimeters declines as a very slow linear relationship to distance from the center of a galaxy rather than declining as the inverse square of distance."

The Inverse Square Law And Newtonian Dynamics space explorer
https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.00698
Author's credentials: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/...
If you still aren't convinced, here is a whole paper on the subject. The author has plenty of the traditional academic credentials to make you feel warm and fuzzy.

The Current Experiment to Test MOND
   • Is the Inverse Square Law WRONG?  
It's getting real people!

The Alternative to Dark Matter May be General Relativity Itself
https://astrobites.org/2020/08/17/the...
This article is NOT about MOND, but it is exploring a similar or parallel solution that suggests taking better account of the effect of overlapping gravitational fields.

Finally, as there appears to be some controversy over my beard, here is a TOTALLY scientific article on why I should keep mine:
https://www.lifehack.org/324346/scien...