In this video we compared four SUVs from 2000s: Jeep Grand Cherokee, Toyota 4Runner, Nissan Pathfinder and Mitsubishi Pajero. The cars are supposed to drive through four unique obstacles with various types of surface: dirt, rubble, rocks and sand.

Traditionally the sequence of drives is set by increase of the torque levels.

Per lucky chance all vehicles are equipped with similar (!!!) BF Goodrich All-Terrain T/A KO2-s. So this time the test is only half-unfair.

Timestamps:
00:00 Intro
00:34 Next video announcement
00:52 BFGoodrich All-Terrain T/A

The first obstacle: Dirt climb
01:24 Mitsubishi Pajero / Low Range + C/D Lock
02:23 Toyota 4Runner / Low Range
03:25 Nissan Pathfinder / Low Range + 4WD Lock
06:06 Jeep Grand Cherokee / Low Range

The second obstacle: Rocky Gate
10:27 Mitsubishi Pajero / Low Range + C/D Lock
11:03 Toyota 4Runner / Low Range
11:37 Nissan Pathfinder / Low Range + 4WD Lock
15:06 Jeep Grand Cherokee / Low Range

The third obstacle: S-shape Uphill Rocky Turn
16:31 Mitsubishi Pajero / Low Range + C/D Lock
17:18 Toyota 4Runner / Low Range
18:16 Jeep Grand Cherokee / Low Range
19:39 Nissan Pathfinder / Low Range + 4WD Lock

The fourth obstacle: Long Sandy Climb
23:12 Mitsubishi Pajero / Low Range + ESP: Off
24:22 Toyota 4Runner / ESP: Off
25:55 Jeep Grand Cherokee / ESP: Off
26:53 Nissan Pathfinder / ESP: Off

32:00 Summarizing & awarding of the places

Please let me know in the comment section below: What SUV was a surprise for you and from which one you've expected more?
_____________________________________________________________________

Another video with Jeep Grand Cherokee:
Clash of the Titans 3:    • SUV Battle 2021: Clash of the Titans ...  

Another video with Nissan Pathfinder:
Bremach 4x4 versus Nissan Pathfinder:    • SUV Battle 2021: Bremach 4x4 SUV vs. ...  

Another video with Mitsubishi Pajero 4:
Crossovers versus Off-Roaders:    • SUV Battle 2021: Crossovers versus Of...