| Description |
This video examines the electric motors by Archer and Joby, the two frontrunners in the eVTOL industry. We start with a high-level analysis of their relative benefits and drawbacks, scoping our analysis to their torque and power densities. The intention is to open a broader and more detailed technical discussion. Finally, we conclude with an answer to the question: who has the better motor?

| Timestamps |
0:00 Introduction
0:48 Analysis of Archer's motors
11:52 Analysis of Joby's motors
18:15 Conclusion

| Disclaimer |
For an aircraft engineer like myself, the advent of the eVTOL industry is exciting. The industry's current state is that many companies are exploring different aircraft designs and innovations. Some will work, but many will fail because they will ultimately be less economical or technically inferior. I aim to be an independent analyst, educator, and commentator about what aircraft concepts are sensible and feasible and what could be more challenging. I want to share those insights, hoping that they will accelerate the learning curve that the industry is on.

It is important to note that I do not provide investment advice. I am not telling you to buy or sell a particular stock. Instead, I provide opinions on the aircraft design. Whether or not companies will be successful depends on numerous factors, of which the aircraft design is only a fraction. With teaching as my priority, I aim to boost our understanding of maths, physics, and engineering by using this exciting industry as the motivating context.

My research and reports express my opinions, which I have based upon generally available public information, field research, inferences and deductions through my due diligence and analytical process. To the best of my ability and belief, all information contained herein is accurate and reliable, and has been obtained from public sources I believe to be accurate and reliable. I strive for accuracy and completeness to support my opinions, and I have a good faith belief in everything I write, however, all such information is presented “as is,” without warranty of any kind – whether express or implied. I make no representation, express or implied, as to the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of any such information or with regard to the results to be obtained from its use. You agree that the use of my research is at your own risk. In no event will I be liable for any direct or indirect trading losses caused by any information available on this report. Think critically about my opinions and do your own research and analysis before making any decisions.

I am entitled to my opinions and to the right to express such opinions in a public forum. I believe that the publication of my opinions about public companies that I research is in the public interest. This report and all statements contained herein are my opinions and are not statements of fact. You can publicly access any piece of evidence cited in this report or that I relied on to create this report. All expressions of opinion are subject to change without notice, and I do not undertake to update or supplement any reports or any of the information, analysis and opinion contained in them.

| References |
(see the comments section below)